U.S. lack of taking responsiblity in agreements the biggest hindrance for peace on the Korean penninsula

If the united states had  stayed true to their word and left the Korean penninsula by 1945 as promised at foreign minister conference of the allied forces held in Moscow after Japans final defeat, then the colonial problem that now persist on the penninsula would never have been. The military presence of UNITED STATES ARMY, is by far the biggest hindrance for the peaceful independent unification, and nothing else rivals that position.

RG MUGABE once wrote in his book our war of liberation that:

”A further point that must be noted in resoect of the principle of  one-man-one-vote is that it can only derive its full scope and meaning where physical power (military power) has been equally and effectivly transferred alongside political power to the people.[…]

Our votes must go together with our guns after all. any vote we shall have shall have been the product of the gun, the gun which produces the votes should remain its security officer- it's garantor"

The liberation struggle is one step to attain independce, another is to maintain it.

 problem is for KOREA is that after having won independence from Japan she lost it to U.S. in only a few years time. People often talk about the heavily gaurded DMZ, but seldom speak of the war crimes of the united states, in the very same region. You don’t have to be a veteran politician to understand tat fi your are under treath by weaponry of the biggest military force in the world, then you do anything in your capability to safegaurd what you have gauned.

Should the armistice be traded for a genuine peace treaty, then things would look different, this has not to do with capitalism or socialism and definatly nothing to do with DPRK satelites being suspected missiles, it has to do with U.S. Persistent colonial policy through military presence in a county that should have been left well enough alone, way back when…

why sanctions?

Soverignity and independce are like freedom of choice, they are basic traits that make what is known as humanity and freedom of concience, these are God given traits and rights given to all humanbeings not regarding colour, creed or political opinion.

The other day I read at the homepage of UN Geneal assembly how great it was that member state could partake in the general debate. Problem is that due to the colonial set up of the so called security council there exists an a team and a b team in that race within the UN. For instance swedish newspapers defended the idea of sanctions in the DPRK because they claimed former chairman of the counties biggest party, used to travel by train on state visits ordering Iranian caviar and lobster. As was idea that Mugabe has become mad in old age, madee neo liberal newspapers call for unilateral sanctions with a targeted nature

What is crazy is that a chairmans eating habits, wether true or not, can never define a reason for unilateral sanctions, if such was the case the election of younger and seemingly happier chairman would have been enough reason to change the policy.

To be serious there are no such thing as targeted sanctions happening under the guidance of the seciury council. It’s a tool to create social unrest on grassroots level, and everybody knows it is also an tool for paving the wave for coup detate or two.

For instance the breakdown of the arab socialist jamahariah of Lybia was pictured as a rebel uproar towards a man of the people turned autocrat, but few were given the real story behind the mechanism of those reactionary winds of change, that made gaddafis downfall and opened up for an official EU office in Lybia(!!) without any solution for the social unrest, more than a new flag waving it’s banner in the air.

DPRK are not being held under sanctions because of former leader the late Kim Jong IL’s eating habits, you don’t have to be juche-ite to relalise this, it’s imperial problem of colonial proportion. It’s the story of a whole people being brae enough to blaze their own path with or without Kim Jong IL who has now pased away. When demonising does not work, propaganda war and sanctions is next to come. The fact that the argicultural revolution, spearheaded by the very same Kim Jong Il in since the vast natural desasters of mid 90’s with new crops and a broad exchange of experience with other countries within the NAM, is something that is often unheard of in the west. And this is something that has to be said, it is not a question of being Socialist or not the right for mankind to decided it’s own destiiny rests assured as a Godgiven right, since the day of Adam and Eve. DPRK for instance has been punished for their space programme in the way Jomhuri Eslami has been punished for their nuclear energy programme, and it is easy to see double standards in such a decision, I mean who has ever punished Japan or U.S of A for similiar things. I don’t know anything about Obamas eating habits, but noone would believe they are the reasons for wall street being on the verge of breakdown… demonising has that side to it also, the simplification. The potato revolution early 00’s in Korea under Kim Jong IL may sound like a big joke to some, but it is something that has resulted in major improvments in day to day living in the DPRK because a varied section of produce, agricultural planing makes for better crops in general.

It is like the old Koranic story when Prophet Josph is asked to interpret a dream ”Joseph, thou true man, pronounce to us regarding seven fat kine, that seven lean ones were devouring, seven green ears of corn, and seven withered; haply I shall return to the men, haply they will know.' He said, 'You shall sow seven years after your wont; what you have harvested leave in the ear, excepting a little whereof you eat.

Then thereafter there shall come upon you seven hard years, that shall devour what you have laid up for them, all but a little you keep in store.”

Koran 12:46 onward

Countries in the post colonial  world are now regrouping under the banner of mutual respect and non interfereance in internal affairs. It’s like when I wrote some years ago about Lao PDR gearing towards it’s goal pf selfsufficency in rise production, it was out in the open during the world food summit in rome 2009, but as good as noone gave that part of what Dr. Ty Phommasack said on the subject, I guess the same old fables of ’autocratic leaders vasting moey on lobster works better for peopl’e who conciousness is being held on ransom by the tabloid evening papers.

Reflection; Kim Jong Un NEW YEARS ADDRESS

Reflection;

Kim Jong Un NEW YEARS ADDRESS

For many years socialist Construction has been a though mission to accomplish On the Korean Peninsula one of the hindrances has been the ongoing hostility from imperial power but also if one should put any weight on the Korean people themselves, there has been the problem between matching the ideal with the practical reality. Different needs has resulted in the development of new world outlooks, like the juche philosophy and the songun system. It is hard to develop under a treath of war, but it is nice to see that the newly elected chairman of the  countries' biggest party remains a public figure, he can also emerge as a positive figure with no hidden speculation around him. In his new years address he expressed like any other human being that greeting "the new year I wish that the families across the country would overflow with greater happiness and joy." This openenes and traqulity and poignancy of heart is most benifical for the whole country and defies the cold war atmophere that has been plaguing the penninsula for years and years. This new outlook must to some extent have to do with the new and young leadership and onlookers from around the globe may now soften their  estranged attitudes Towards dprk and it’s people, and hopefully advance north south cooperation.

China and party discipline: which way is China heading?

                                                              Comrade XI

 

                                                                 Comrade Jiang

                                                               Comrade Hu

”We have advanced reform with the fundamental purpose of making our nation stronger and more prosperous. We are aiming to achieve a higher degree of impartiality and justice in society so that people can live a better life.

Reform is a great cause that calls for common commitments and strenuous efforts from all of us. Under the reform and opening up, we have already made countless spectacular achievements. I firmly believe that the Chinese people will achieve even greater heights than before.

More than 7 billion people inhabit the planet Earth. We are all in the same boat and must keep watch and help each other to achieve common development.”

Above saying is of Comrade Xi Jingping who in his new years adress stressed common development, since China PR is the largest developing country in this world there will always remain a great interest in how the nation forges ahead with cooperation with other developing countries. As development in industry speeds on there has been reports of a slight backfire considering the great amount of emissions. Comrade XI as secteritary of the CPC has said that purity in ideology is essential to pull off the party’s historic mission. In his speech entitled work solidly and painstakingly to perserve party unity he came to qoute Lenin in saying ” "Our task is to maintain our party's steadfastness and purity. We must raise, raise, and raise again the reputation and effectiveness of our members". Marxist parties place so much emphasis on party purity because it is key to maintaining the party's political character, its vitality and energy, and therefore its ability to carry out its historic mission.

The saying comes in a time were the dealing with corruption has become accute. The only problem is that there is a limitation in marxism as a world view in over emphasising the role of the working class as vanguards of the revolution and over emphasising economic development. Maos biggest mistake was mixing up idealist attituteds and over emphasising them over the countries practical conditions. Comrade Deng saw to the needs of the times and the limitations of a one sided economy, as it is written in his book fundamental principles in present day china in a discussion with then Zimbabwe PM comrade RG MUGABE. ”China did the mistake och trying to plunge ahead to fast” Under Comrade Jiangs leadership we saw a different emphasis, for as he said speaking at harvard university(!!)

"Sunlight is composed of seven colors; so is our world full of colors and splendor. Every country and every nation has its own historical and cultural traditions, strong points and advantages. We should respect and learn from each other and draw upon others' strong points to offset one's own deficiencies for achieving common progress"

IT has been said in the biography on his achievements that comrade Jiang was different in his outlook from his predessors and a gear towards speaking about the whole society and world in interaction not only ”working  class” or masses. Hu Jintao maintained this view but also launched a socialist core value system and tried to formulate his concept Scientific development along side Marxism Leninnism Mao Zedong thought and Deng Xiaopeng theory, in meaning that the concept of the three represents fromulated by Comrade jang must also keep in line with the times. It is indeed difficult to speak about ’the masses’ in a country that has 50 different ethnic groups, and even if MAO ZEDONG THOUGHT, was proven effective as a tool during the anti colonial struggle, it’s ideals are hard to implement and put into reality in todays China PR, because of the pratical reality with the advancment of the productive forces which as Comrade Jingping means can be both the countries strength an achllies heal i.e the industrial expansion and inevitable rising of contamenation. It will br interestingto see how Jingping handles the issue of party discipline and whether can maintain the succesful course of mutual benefit through exchange with other countries, or if he gets stuck on this party discpline line, it’s to early to tell, but we will keep our eyes open, which way is China heading, from thse speeches it remains a bit difficult to decipher, and the last word has not been said on the subject.

the era of anti imperialism through mutal respect and mutual benefit

mutural respect and equal footing in foreign relations

Soverignty is the perhaps  greatest Human right. We have seen coutries fight for it, so that the indpendence becomes more than merely a paper independence.

As it was said in the election manifesto of ZANU (PF) 2008

"Our vision is to

found an owning society, well empowered to control and

use its resources equitably and sustainably. We have

already started with the Land; we are now focusing on

what lies underneath it: our mineral resources which

must come under the majority control of the

Zimbabwean People. These are finite, non-renewable

resources; they cannot be scooped away by foreigners

while we remain disinterested by-standers or mere

underpaid labourers. How then would we say we are

Independent and Sovereign? ZANU (P.F.) does not

believe in paper or flag independence. This is why

ZANU (P.F.) launched the Third Chimurenga, which

must now expand to other sectors of the economy until

our people cease to be minors in their economy."

The zimbabwean people spearhead this revolution step by step from clarity to clarity beause they have a well thought after vision, well aware that after years in the trenches fighting apartheid the people are aware things does not happen over night.

The Korean People's leader, Legendary Kim IL SUNG once wrote a profound article on non aligment, where he pointed out in his book that the non aligment movement is a powerful anti imperialistic force in our time. Even andropov had to admit in his own mid 80's writings, and infact it getting more relevant now in this unipolar world. the biggest superpower in the world is nearing bankrupcy more and more nations in the 'allied forces' are withdrawing from Afghanistan, having caused more damage than benefit for her people.

Dr Ahmadinejad said in 62 session to the UN GENERAL ASSEMBLY that the bright future for mankind will come. In Shiism the key is to know God and pratice patience, an concept upheld by maintaining faith in entezar, which means the patient awaiting for the 12 apostolic Emam and Christ to return. People may think Shiism by such means remains a passive world outlook, but such is not the case, anyone who familiars oneself with the life and mission of the twelve Emams know otherwise.

Emam Hasan once said something that is going to live on forever “never did a nation resort to mutual councel except that they were guided by it towards

maturity.”

the corruption within the Caliphat in his time was well known and widespread, but never did he let things stop him from embarking his works on a peace treaty. to achieve peace, we must realise we are not alone in the world, and that differnt people have different needs, even if we know IMPERIALISM is crumbling and that the last superpower and greatest millitary power will sooner or later break down, we cannot advance this happening through the work of weaponry and arms. To maintain stability the postcolonial world has started to work together based on mutual counsel. Like the exchange between DPRK and I.R Iran concerning film and arts or the profound China Africa Cooperation project, the SADC in southern Africa and others. Thanks to the untiring work of leaders like persident Rohani, who said  moderation an wisdom will guide my government, as he spoke on asia society meeting on foreign council.

I.R IRAN along with Zimbabwe an DPRK mentioned above are all countries with a revolutionary history, but as rohani states there is still a practical reality and an ideal. The assessments of new goals to be achieved in a process of opening up while maintaining indpendence can be done via the NAM, an institution formed in the height of the cold war, still has a key role to play in todays world